To Whom it May Concern, I am writing this letter with concern for the future of our inalienable rights. HB No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a direct attack on our SECOND and FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Removing personal property based upon often times emotional, one sided hearsay is a direct violation of constitutional rights. I OPPOSE HB NO.5448, I URGE YOU TO DO...
Loading...
OPPOSE Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant To Whom it May Concern, The Giffords/Bloomberg system, allows petitions to be filed by a very wide variety of people, including ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends. Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a petition must be filed by two law enforcement officers, and they must have conducted an independent investigation. Best Regards, [INSERT NAME]
Judiciary Committee Room 2500 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSE: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. SUPPORT: AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members, I am opposed to HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. This bill is talking about taking away people's rights and...
Dear Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I Oppose H.B. 5448: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I Support H.B. No. 5390: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I Support H.B. No. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS H.B. 5448 is a horrible bill that targets gun owners by stripping them of their 2nd,...
Members of the Judiciary Committee, OPPOSE HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. This bill is a slippery slope to the erosion of our basic freedoms. The checks and balances of The Constitution is what makes the citizens of this country free from the government. The fourth amendment wasn’t intended to be executed upon hearsay. This bill simply targets gun owners and denies them the right...
Oppose- AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Support- AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; I’m opposed to AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill as yet another political attack on gun owners and the Second Amendment by liberals and gun control advocates. [INSERT NAME] [INSERT TOWN]
OPPOSE-Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant SUPPORT- Raised HB-5390 An Act Concerning the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship. SUPPORT- Raised HB-5432 An Act Concerning Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons. To Whom it May Concern, HB-5448 expand the list of persons who may seek a risk warrant. Currently, anyone can call the police at any time to do this. HB-5390 this is common...
Dear Judiciary Committee, I Oppose H.B. 5448, I Support H.B. No. 5390, I Support H.B. No. 5432 I urge you to oppose H.B. 5448. This is just wrong that someone can have their civil rights stripped and be forced to get rid of their legally owned property without the due process Americans expect. Where are the penalties for anyone filing a false claim? Why should someone be forced to spend...
Dear Committee, I am a resident of Connecticut and wish to voice my opposition for Bill 5448. Your opposition for this bill is important to me. There are already laws on the books that can protect people instead of this bill changing the existing law into something which I see being too easy to abuse. Sincerely, [INSERT NAME] [INSERT TOWN]
Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To: Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to H.B. 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant because a study of the Indiana law allowing police to seize firearms from people, they considered dangerous, found outcomes closely correlated to defendants' presence at the...