To the members of the Judiciary Committee Re: H.B. No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights proposed by HB 5448. An actual abuser can use this to disarm their intended victim, and then following that, their intended and now disarmed potential victim has to prove by a “preponderance of evidence” they are really...

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, It is well-known in family and domestic law that ex parte procedures with low standards of evidence are often abused by angry spouses in a divorce, jilted lovers, and so on. Do not take away the investigation by a 3rd party. Oppose HB5448. Support...

Re: SUPPORT HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Joint Committee on Judiciary, I’m opposed to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Again, this committee stance is taking the guns away first, go through...

I Oppose H.B. 5448: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I Support H.B. No. 5390: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I Support H.B. No. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Dear Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I oppose H.B. 5448 and urge you to also oppose it.  This bill ignores due process,...

To Whom it May Concern,                 I am writing this letter with concern for the future of our inalienable rights. HB No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a direct attack on our SECOND and FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Removing personal property based upon often times emotional, one sided hearsay is a direct violation of constitutional rights. I OPPOSE HB NO.5448, I URGE YOU TO DO...

OPPOSE Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant To Whom it May Concern, The Giffords/Bloomberg system, allows petitions to be filed by a very wide variety of people, including ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends. Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a petition must be filed by two law enforcement officers, and they must have conducted an independent investigation. Best Regards, [INSERT NAME]